Exaggeration in disciplinary sanctions (a comparative study)

The idea of research is summarized in the study of exaggeration as a form of abuse in the use of the administrative right, which is achieved through an objective standard of blatant disproportion between the disciplinary penalties approved on the employee and the disciplinary error committed by him, and that exaggeration is achieved in two cases and is excessive severity or negligence (softness and indulgence), and the importance of the study lies through drawing the boundaries of the authority of the administration in the use of its right and ensure that it is not arbitrary. The research included the study of exaggeration through two sections, the first included everything related to the concept of exaggeration in terms of its meaning, content, standards, cases, proof, and statement of its legal nature. The other included manifestations and applications of exaggeration in Iraq, Egypt, and France. The research concluded that the administration must be committed not to exaggeration, Otherwise, it will be held liable to cancel the penalty, reducing or tightening it to achieve the public interest.