Can the Federal Supreme Court of Iraq apply the Judicial Review methods followed by the Supreme Court of U.S.?

Section: RESEARCH
Issue
Vol. 23 No. 73 (2020): Volume 23 Issue 73
Published
Aug 4, 2025
Pages
1-28

Abstract

This paper will start with a discussion of the United States experience of judicial review. It is important to address a different method, the common law method, because the new constitutional court in Iraq needs to look at a variety of approaches around the world. The United States judicial review has its vital roots in a repugnancy theory of a sort, and this repugnancy can be compared in some helpful ways with modern repugnancy clauses in the Islamic world. To see this clearly, we need to take a closer look at some of the Constitution's key provisions. One key provision, Article VI, makes the Constitution the supreme law of the land and requires the court to be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.1 In addition, the court is granted the power to decide cases arising under the Constitution, laws, and treaties of the United States.2 Gradually, the United States judicial review has evolved in line with society's needs and political orientations as well as a judges own values, which may vary over time.3 A consideration of these issues ensures that the United States has its own unique method of applying the repugnancy clause related to the history of its developing judicial system, and the political impact of judicial determinations.

References

  1. U.S. 551, 112 S. W. 3d 397 (2005).
  2. Althouse, Ann Time for the Federal Courts to Enforce the Guarantee Clause?--A Response to Professor Chemerinsky, University of Colorado Law Review 65, (1994)
  3. Backer, Larry Cat From Constitution to Constitutionalism: A Global Framework for Legitimate Public Power Systems. Penn State Law Review 113, no. 3, (September 22, 2008)
  4. BIBLIOGRAPHY
  5. Constitutions & Laws
  6. The Constitution of United States of America 1789.
  7. Dustour Jumhuriyat al-Iraq [The Constitution of the Republic of Iraq] of 2005.
  8. Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20, 25, 1 Stat. 83, 85-87.
  9. The Federalist No. 78, at 394(Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961).
  10. Tillman Act, Pub. L. No. 59-36, 34 Stat. 864, 865 (1907) (codified as amended at 2 U.S.C. 441b(a) (2006).
  11. Higher Judicial Council No 45 of 2017
  12. Cases
  13. Dr. Bonham's Case, 8 Co. Rep. 114 (Court of Common Pleas
  14. Bilder, Mary Sarah The Corporate Origins of Judicial Review.The Yale Law Journal116, no. 3 (January 2006)
  15. Brown, Nathan Judicial Review and the Arab World.Journal of Democracy9, no. 4 (1998)
  16. Chemerinsky, Erwin Why Cases Under the Guarantee Clause Should Be Justiciabl. University of Colorado Law Review 65 (1994): 851.
  17. Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 130 S. Ct. 876 (2010).
  18. Clinton, Robert Lowry Democracy, the Supreme Court, and Our Two Constitutions, Faulkner Law Review 8, no.1, (2016):
  19. Dr. Bonham's Case, 8 Co. Rep. 114 (Court of Common Pleas [1610])
  20. Dustour Jumhuriyat al-Iraq [The Constitution of the Republic of Iraq] of 2005.
  21. Dworkin, Ronald,Freedoms Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. ( Oxford University Press, 1996.)
  22. Ely, John Hart Democracy and Distrust: a Theory of Juridical Review. Harvard University Press, 1980.
  23. ErwinChemerinsky, Interpreting the Constitution. (New York: Praeger, 1987)
  24. Feldman, Noah & Martinez, Roman Constitutional Politics and Text in the Next Iraq: An Experiment in Islamic Democracy. Fordham Law Review, 75, no. 2 (November 2006) 883, 919.
  25. Fiss, Owen M. Objectivity and Interpretation.Stanford Law Review34, no. 4 (1982): 739.
  26. Giesze, Craig R., Helms-Burton in Light of the Common Law and Civil Law Legal Traditions: Is Legal Analysis Alone Sufficient to Settle Controversies Arising Under International Law on the Eve of the Second Summit of the Americas? The International Lawyer32, No. 1 (SPRING 1998)
  27. Gottlieb, Stephen E. Does What We Know About the Life Cycle of Democracy Fit Constitutional Law? Rutgers Law Review 61, 595, (2009)
  28. Hamburger, Philip Law and Judicial Duty, The George Washington Law Review72, no. 1, 12 (2003)
  29. Hamoudi, Haider Ala Negotiating in Civil Conflict: Constitutional Construction and Imperfect Bargaining in Iraq. (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2014)
  30. Hamoudi, Haider Ala Resurrecting Islam or Cementing Social Hierarchy?: Reexamining the Codification of Islamic Personal Status Law, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 33 (2018)
  31. Helmholz R.H., Bonhams Case, Judicial Review, and the Law of Nature,Journal of Legal Analysis1, no. 1 (January 2009)
  32. Higher Judicial Council No 45 of 2017
  33. Hill, Enid Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law: The Place and Significance of Islamic Law in the Life and Work of Abd Al-Razzaq Ahmad Al-Sanhuri, Egyptian Jurist and Scholar, 1895-1971.Arab Law Quarterly3, no. 1 (1988).
  34. Judiciary Act of 1789, ch. 20, 25, 1 Stat. 83, 85-87.
  35. King v. Earl of Banbury, Skinner, 517, 526-7 (K. B. 1694) , Day v. Savage, Hobart (3d ed. i67i) 85 (K. B. 1614)and The City of London v. Wood, 12 Mod. 669, 687 (K. B. 1701)
  36. Lever, Annabelle Democracy, and Judicial Review: Are They Really Incompatible? (Perspectives on Politics 7, no.4, 2009).
  37. Levinson, Sanford and Mailloux, Steven,Interpreting Law and Literature a Hermeneutic Reader. (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998.):155.
  38. Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1, 12 L. Ed. 581 (1849).
  39. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 138, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803).
  40. Mcgovney, Dudley Odell The British Origin of Judicial Review of Legislation,University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register93, no. 1 (1944)
  41. Merryman, John Henry & Perez-Perdomo, Rogelio,"The Civil Law Tradition : an Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America, Fourth Edition. "Stanford University Press(4d ed 2018).
  42. Michael W. McConnell, The Redistricting Cases: Original Mistakes and Current Consequences, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 24 (2000)
  43. Patrick, Glenn H., Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
  44. Posner, Richard A., How Judges Think. New Delhi (Universal Law Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 2008)
  45. Rabb, Intisar The Least Religious Branch? Judicial Review and the New Islamic Constitutionalism, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 17(2013):83.
  46. Redding, Jeffrey A. "Constitutionalizing Islam: Theory and Pakistan," Virginia Journal of International Law 44 (2004)
  47. Robin v. Hardaway, Jefferson iog, 114 (Va. 1772)
  48. Ronald Dworkin, The Decision That Threatens Democracy. The New York Review of Books. Accessed March 5, 2018. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2010/05/13/decision-threatens-democracy.
  49. Samuel, Issacharoff Constitutional Courts and Democratic Hedging. The American Journal of Comparative Law 62, No. 3 (SUMMER 2014)
  50. Scalia,Antonin, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law,( Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press, 1998.):7.
  51. Sheppard, Steve "The State Interest in the Good Citizen: Constitutional Balance Between the Citizen and the Perfectionist State," Hastings Law Journal 45(1994):969.
  52. Smith, Tara, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System. (Cambridge Univ Press, 2017): 46-66 Also, see Jack M. Balkin,Living Originalism. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011)
  53. Somin, Ilya Democracy & Judicial Review Revisited the New Old Critique of Judicial Power, Green Bag 7, no. 2, (2004)
  54. The Constitution of United States of America 1789.
  55. The Federalist No. 78, at 394(Alexander Hamilton) (Clinton Rossiter ed., 1961).
  56. Tillman Act, Pub. L. No. 59-36, 34 Stat. 864, 865 (1907) (codified as amended at 2 U.S.C. 441b(a) (2006).
  57. Vieth v. Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267, 288, 124 S. Ct. 1769, 1782, 158 L. Ed. 2d 546 (2004) also see New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 184 (1992).
  58. Ward, Damen Legislation, Repugnancy and the Disallowance of Colonial Laws: The Legal Structure of Empire and Lloyds Case (1844). Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 41, no. 3 (June 2010)
  59. Wolcher, Louis E. A Philosophical Investigation into Methods of Constitutional Interpretation in the United States and the United Kingdom. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 13, (2006)

Author

Oday Talal Mahmood

College Of Law and Political Science - Al Iraqia University

ORCID

Identifiers

https://doi.org/10.33899/rlawj.2020.126775.1056
Download this PDF file
PDF

Statistics