The constitutional judiciary controls the restriction of rights and freedoms

Section: RESEARCH
Issue
Vol. 26 No. 88 (2024): Volume 26 Issue 88
Published
Aug 4, 2025
Pages
550-595

Abstract

The endorsement of rights and freedoms in the constitution does not in any way mean that they are unleashed without restrictions, as the purpose of setting these restrictions is to create a kind of balance between the rights of citizens on the one hand and the rights of public authorities on the other hand, however these restrictions may be multiple, including What is constitutional, including what is legislative, and for the sake of real protection of rights and freedoms from restriction, especially legislative restriction. According to the laws and regulations issued by the authorities, as monitoring the constitutional judiciary is one of the most important components of building a democratic state, and therefore the constitutional judiciary oversight of the actions issued by the public authorities, especially the legislative authority, is necessary.

References

  1. . The ruling of the Supreme Court in South Africa in the case (Gauteng Division, Pretoria) No. (21542/2020), dated (2/ June /2020), published on the following website: https://www.saflii.org.
  2. Andreescu. Marius, & Puran. Andra, State power and the restriction of the exercise of certain Rights and Freedoms, )Journal of Law and Administrative sciences, The Centre for Studies and Legal and Socio-Administrative Research, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, N7|2017(
  3. Bychawska-Siniarska. Dominika, Protecting the Right to Freedom of Expression under the European Convention Human Rights, )Council of Europe, Strasbourg, July |2017(.
  4. (65) (2004(.
  5. 2 ) . (.
  6. . - ( | 2003).
  7. (1948).
  8. . 1 ( |2016).
  9. . ( | 2005)
  10. . : ( ) 1 ( - | 2016)
  11. . ( | 2006).
  12. . , ( ) 1 ( | 2009).
  13. . 1 ( |2018).
  14. . : 9 ( |1393 -1971 ) .
  15. . - 1 ( |2009).
  16. . - ( | 2019).
  17. . , . : 1 1 ( |2014).
  18. . ( 8 29| 2019).
  19. (1966).
  20. . 2005 ( | 2012).
  21. /8/2010 https://www.hjc.iq 28/5/2020 .
  22. . 1 ( - | 2015).
  23. . " 49 " ( | 2017).
  24. . 2 ( -| 2011).
  25. . , - ( | 2012).
  26. . ( |1998).
  27. : (DRI)(- | 2012)
  28. . - ( "" | 2015) .
  29. . ( |2009).
  30. . ( ) 1 ( |2012).
  31. (1949) .
  32. (2005).
  33. (2014).
  34. (2014).
  35. (1996).
  36. (2003).
  37. (1999) .
  38. (2010).
  39. . 2 ( |2014).
  40. 2 2015.
  41. . , 2 ( |2000)
  42. . 2 ( | 2010)
  43. . ( ) 1 ( | 2019).
  44. . 1 1 ( | 2014).
  45. . - ( | 2018).
  46. . ( 4 2 |2019).
  47. . , 1 ( ).
  48. - ) 1 ( - | 2019).
  49. . : 1 ( .2018).
  50. . 2 . (|1996).
  51. . ( ) ( |2011).
  52. (92) (2016).
  53. (111) (1969) .
  54. (8) (2019).
  55. (97) (1959).
  56. (32) (2015).
  57. / / 2008 24/11/2008.
  58. . - ( " " | 2015-2016).
  59. . - 1 ( | 2016).
  60. . ( | 2008-2009).
  61. . , 1 ( |2019).
  62. . - ( - | 2015).
  63. . ( 24| 2009).

Authors

Luqman Sheikh Bzeeny

جامعة الموصل الموصل/ محافظة نینوى

ORCID
Ibrahim Muhammad

Nineveh Federal Court of Appeal

ORCID

Identifiers

https://doi.org/10.33899/alaw.2020.129013.1116
Download this PDF file
PDF

Statistics