Attitude of British Governments towards Syrian Crisis 2011-2018
Abstract
During 2011, Syria witnessed a dangerous turning point in its contemporary history, resulting in what is known as the (Syrian crisis) as the policy by which the Syrian state is managed for more than fifty years has become sterile to produce democratic practices, a peaceful transfer of power as well as a great deficit in achieving progress in economic and social aspects appropriate for the Syrian state, especially as it has passed the second decade of the new millennium and influenced by the Arab Spring that stormed both (Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya), which succeeded in both (Tunisia and Egypt) and brought relative stability after it entered more than a page in the change field. As for Syria, it is because of the Syrian regimes inability to contain the crisis from the very beginning, and Syria has become an arena for many regional and international countries looking for a foothold in it, including Britain, which entered the front line of the Syrian regime from the very first moment during the term of (David Cameron and Theresa May) as prime ministers in Britain through pressuring Syria at the start diplomatically, held the regime responsible for what was going on, then soon exceeded that by directing military strikes to the strategic sites of the Syrian regime, and other strikes against the most extremist factions fighting the regime.