Al-Hudhali's morphological choices in his (alkamil) book The broken plural and the name of the genus as a model

This research aims to stand on the choices of Abu al-Qasim al-Hudhali (Yusuf bin Ali) deceased: (465AH) in his book (alkamil fi alqira'at alkhamsin) in the brushes of letters, he chose al-Hudhali among the readings of the Qur'an what he saw that he Arhaj reading and reasons for his choice, and the value of the book and the height of his work and good choices we have been studying it as the book was not singled out by an independent morphological study, which is a source of morphological restriction, it has linguistic and dialectal performances and eloquent uses of what simulates the evidence of Arabic From poetry and prose, but outweighed by eloquence and statement, so we decided to follow those words that were read with the word plural cracker once, and the pronunciation of the name of the genus once, collection and statistics, and then we stood on the sayings of the people of the language in the reason for choosing each reading, and we mentioned the choice of Imam Al-Hudhali, and we showed the reason for his choice, and we realized what we saw preponderant in the choice, in agreement with Al-Hudhali or contrary to him, and then we highlighted it in an independent search to enrich the research and exclusively for interest. This study has revealed that morphological phenomena occupy a high and distinct position among the rest of the linguistic phenomena that were filled with readings, the differences between these readings revolve mostly in the orbit of heterogeneity and substitution, which works in most of its phenomena at the level of morphological evidence, especially the structure of names, and this study showed that the difference in reading between the fact that the pronunciation is a genus name or the collection of cracking represents a morphological phenomenon that has a prominent presence at the level of meaning, as this study paints us a picture of the Arabic approach in The construction of plural in them, and how they resort to changing the sounds of structure to express the meanings of the few and the many in their deliberative contexts.