Suggested criteria for the selection of male and female teachers in the light of some variables of the teaching profession from the point of view of teachers and supervisors.

The current research aims to develop proposed criteria for the selection of male and female teachers in the light of some variables for the teaching profession from the point of view of the teachers and specialized supervisors. The study group (2020-2021) and the total number of its members (312), as a whole of teachers and supervisors, specialization, and by (195) teaching and teaching and (117) supervisors. The first domain: Personal characteristics A- (for both sexes) consists of (16) criteria, the second domain is personal characteristics B- (for female teachers) consists of (5) criteria, the third domain is controls, consists of (22) criteria, and the fourth domain is application (teaching skills) component Of (10) standards, the fifth field is theoretical and cognitive information during micro- teaching, consisting of (16) standards, and the sixth field in digital culture consists of (10) standards, and the seventh field is leadership abilities consisting of (9) standards in its final form. To verify its validity, stability, and the strength of distinguishing criteria, the researchers applied the tool (the proposed criteria) to a sample of supervisors with specialization on (10/1/2021) and continued until (14/1/2021), while the sample of teachers applied it on (19/1/2021) and continued The application until the day (2/2/2021), and after collecting the data and analyzing it statistically using the alpha-Cronbach equation (a-cronbach), the discrimination equation, and the z-test for two independent samples, the results showed the following:1-The ratios were achieved according to the importance of the field. The first field of criteria was the highest standards of importance and the second field in terms of importance was the seventh field, the third field and according to importance was the fourth field, the fourth field and according to importance was the fifth field, then the fifth field, and according to the importance was the sixth field, and according to the sixth field, according to the importance The importance was the third domain, and the seventh domain in terms of importance was the second domain. 2-The percentages achieved for each of the fields are good and according to the viewpoint of the members of the research sample. The first field got the highest percentages, then the seventh field, followed by the fourth field, then the fifth field, and then the third field, then the sixth field. As for the second field, the last of the journals came in terms of The percentages he obtained according to the variable of human specialization.3-The percentages achieved for each of the fields are good and according to the viewpoint of the members of the research sample, the first field got the highest percentages, then the seventh field, followed by the fifth, then the fourth, and then the sixth, then the third. As for the second field, the last of the journals came in terms of Percentages obtained by gender variable (males). 4-The percentages achieved for each of the fields are good and according to the viewpoint of the members of the research sample, the fifth field got the highest percentages, then the first field, followed by the seventh, then the fourth, and then. the sixth, then the third. As for the second field, the last of the journals came in terms of Percentages obtained by gender variable (female). 5-The percentages achieved for each of the fields are good and according to the viewpoint of the members of the research sample, the seventh field got the highest percentages, then the first field, followed by the fourth field, then the fifth field, then the sixth field, then the third field. As for the second field, the last of the journals came in terms of The percentages he obtained according to the variable length of service (10 years or less). 6-The percentages achieved for each of the fields are good and according to the viewpoint of the members of the research sample, the fourth field got the highest percentages, then the first field, followed by the seventh field, then the fifth field, then the sixth field, then the third field. As for the second field, the last of the journals came in terms of The percentages he obtained according to the service variable (10 years and over). 7-There is no statistically significant difference between the views of male and female teachers and supervisors in the proposed criteria for selecting teachers for the teaching profession in the future. 8-There is no statistically significant difference between the two views of teachers and supervisors, who have service (10) years or less, and (10) years or more, in the proposed criteria for selecting teachers for the future teaching profession. The researchers came out with a set of conclusions, recommendations and suggestions.