Investigating the In Vitro Antibiofilm Potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus

Section: Research Paper
Published
Jun 1, 2025
Pages
65-70

Abstract

Background: Biofilms formation by pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus imposes clinical and economical challenges in antibiotic resistance and chronic infection. Uses of probiotics and their metabolites are emerging as promising antibiofilm strategy. Methods: Pro-baby oral drop was used to isolate the probiotics content. One ml of the formulation was cultured on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar plate and inspected for the grown colonies. Isolated pure cultures were sent for 16s gene sequencing. Later, probiotics supernatants were prepared at three time points: 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Antibiofilm effect of the obtained supernatants against S. aureus and E. coli biofilm was tested via 96-well microtiter plate crystal violet staining technique. Results: Two Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains were identified genetically and designated as strain A and B. Supernatants of strain A and B significantly inhibited biofilm formation, with the highest inhibition (82.1%) reported for S. aureus by 48 h-old strain A supernatant. E. coli biofilm formation was effectively suppressed (96.45%) by 72 h-old strain A supernatant. Conclusion: The study suggests that L. rhamnosus supernatants have potent antibiofilm potential against both Gram positive and Gram negative reference pathogens. This promising finding can be further investigated on in vivo infection model.

References

  1. Alakomi HL, Skytt E, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Latva-Kala K, Helander IM. Lactic Acid Permeabilizes Gram-Negative Bacteria by Disrupting the Outer Membrane. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 2000 May;66(5):20015.
  2. Alexandre, Y., Le Berre, R., Barbier, G. et al. Screening of Lactobacillus spp. for the prevention of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pulmonary infections. BMC Microbiology 2014;14:107.
  3. Asadzadegan R,Haratian N, Sadeghi M, et al. Antibiofilm and antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus cell free supernatant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds. International Wound Journal 2023;20(10):4112-4121.
  4. Bae WY, Lee YJ, Jo S, Shin SL, Kim TR, Sohn M, Seol HJ. Effects ofLactiplantibacillus plantarumLM1215 onCandida albicansandGardnerella vaginalis. Yonsei Medical Journal 2024;65(12):727-740.
  5. Barken KB, Pamp SJ, Yang L, Gjermansen M, Bertrand JJ, Klausen M, Givskov M, Whitchurch CB, Engel JN, Tolker-Nielsen T. Roles of type IV pili, flagellum-mediated motility and extracellular DNA in the formation of mature multicellular structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Environmental Microbiology 2008;10 (9):2331-43.
  6. Brinkman CL, Schmidt-Malan SM, Karau MJ, Greenwood-Quaintance K, Hassett DJ, Mandrekar JN, et al. Exposure of Bacterial Biofilms to Electrical Current Leads to Cell Death Mediated in Part by Reactive Oxygen Species. Coenye T, editor. PLOS ONE 2016;11(12):e0168595.
  7. Danilova A, Adzhieva AA, Danilina GA, Polyakov NB, Soloviev AI, Zhukhovitsky VG. Antimicrobial Activity of Supernatant of Lactobacillus plantarum against Pathogenic Microorganisms. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 2019;167(6):7514.
  8. Echresh S, Alizadeh Behbahani B, Falah F, Noshad M, Ibrahim SA. Assessment of the probiotic, anti-bacterial, and anti-biofilm characteristics of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus CWKu-12, along with its potential impact on the expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115. LWT-Food science and Technology 2024;203:116391.
  9. Frickmann H, Klenk C, Warnke P, Redanz S, Podbielski A. Influence of probiotic culture supernatants on in vitro biofilm formation of staphylococci. European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology 2018;8(4):11927.
  10. Gupta P, Sarkar S, Das B, Bhattacharjee S, Tribedi P. Biofilm, pathogenesis and preventiona journey to break the wall: a review. Archive in Microbiology 2016;198(1):115.
  11. Hashim ZA. Evaluation of bacterial contents, package labelling and antimicrobial activity of some commercial probiotic products available in local market. Journal of Research in Pharmacy 2022 ;26(3):502-9.
  12. Kim Y, Oh S, Kim SH. Released exopolysaccharide (r-EPS) produced from probiotic bacteria reduce biofilm formation of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biochemical Biophysical Research Communication 2009;379(2):3249.
  13. Loera-Muro A, Guerrero-Barrera A, Tremblay D N Y, Hathroubi S, Angulo C. Bacterial biofilm-derived antigens: a new strategy for vaccine development against infectious diseases. Expert Review of Vaccines 2021;20(4):385-396.
  14. usiak-Szelachowska M, Weber-Dbrowska B, Grski A. Bacteriophages and Lysins in Biofilm Control. Virology 2020 ;35(2):12533.
  15. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnology Advances 2019;37(1):17792.
  16. Petrova MI, Reid G, Ter Haar JA. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GR-1, a.k.a. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1: Past and Future Perspectives. Trends Microbiology 2021;29(8):74761.
  17. Rather MA, Gupta K, Bardhan P, Borah M, Sarkar A, Eldiehy KSH, et al. Microbial biofilm: A matter of grave concern for human health and food industry. Journal of Basic Microbiology 2021;61(5):38095.
  18. Rather MA, Gupta K, Mandal M. Microbial biofilm: formation, architecture, antibiotic resistance, and control strategies. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 2021;52(4):170118.
  19. Saidi N, Saderi H, Owlia P, Soleimani M. Anti-Biofilm Potential of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Cell-Free Supernatant Extracts against Staphylococcus aureus. Advance in Biomedical Reserach 2023;12:50.
  20. Saidi N, Saderi H, Owlia P, Soleimani M. Anti-Biofilm Potential of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Cell-Free Supernatant Extracts Against Staphylococcus aureus. Advanced Biomedical Research 2023;12(1):50.
  21. Sambanthamoorthy K, Feng X, Patel R, Patel S, Paranavitana C. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiology 2014;14(1):19.
  22. Sambanthamoorthy K, Feng X, Patel R, Patel S, Paranavitana C. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiology 2014;14(1):197.
  23. Todori O, Pezo L, ari L, Kolarov V, Varga A, abarkapa I, et al. Comparison of the Efficiency of Selected Disinfectants against Planktonic and Biofilm Populations of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Microorganisms 2023;11(6):1593.
  24. Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP. Physiological aspects. Part 1 in a series of papers devoted to surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances 2006;24(6):60420.
  25. Vitale I, Spano M, Puca V, Carradori S, Cesa S, Marinacci B, et al. Antibiofilm activity and NMR-based metabolomic characterization of cell-free supernatant of Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. Frontier of Microbiology 2023;14:1128275.
  26. Wallace MJ, Fishbein SRS, Dantas G. Antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria: current state and next-generation solutions. Gut Microbes 2020 ;12(1):1799654.
  27. Xavier-Santos D, Scharlack NK, Pena FDL, Antunes AEC. Effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG supplementation, via food and non-food matrices, on childrens health promotion: A scoping review. Food Research International 2022;158:111518.
  28. Zhang S, Wang L, Liang X, Vorstius J, Keatch R, Corner G, et al. Enhanced Antibacterial and Antiadhesive Activities of Silver-PTFE Nanocomposite Coating for Urinary Catheters. ACS Biomaterial and Scientific Engineering 2019;5(6):280414.
  29. Zhao A, Sun J, Liu Y. Understanding bacterial biofilms: From definition to treatment strategies. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2023;13:1137947.
Download this PDF file

Statistics

How to Cite

Abdullah khaleel, Z., Amer Hashim, Z., & Celiksoy, V. (2025). Investigating the In Vitro Antibiofilm Potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Iraqi Journal of Pharmacy, 22(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.33899/iraqij.p.2025.157895.1133