A comment on a discriminatory decision
Section: Comment on judicial decision
Abstract
AbstractThe underlying principle suggests that individuals typically navigate legal channels independently; however, circumstances may lead them to enlist authorized professionals, known as commentators, to handle legal procedures on their behalf. Despite this norm, the Court of Cassation adopted an unconventional stance, deeming commentary before chambers as a breach of public order. To better comprehend this divergence, an exploration into the Court's jurisprudence within the framework of legal texts is warranted.
References
- Discriminatory Decision No. 8410 - Civil Authority / 2023 on 9/18/2023.
- Iraqi Civil Law No. 40 of 1951, amended.
- Iraqi Law No. 173 of 1966.
- Iraqi Notary Law No. 33 of 1998.
- References
- Discriminatory Decision No. 8410 - Civil Authority / 2023 on 9/18/2023.
- Iraqi Civil Law No. 40 of 1951, amended.
- Iraqi Law No. 173 of 1966.
- Iraqi Notary Law No. 33 of 1998.