The international responsibility of the occupation of Iraq

Section: RESEARCH
Published
Aug 4, 2025
Pages
298-338

Abstract

Responsibility is the axis of any legal system. It could be a tool for developing its rules through its guarantees against abuse, in order to turn from being merely theoretical rules into legal commitments. In the field of international law, the responsibility connects with the cases of violating the commitments imposed by the international law on its members, whether those related to the general rules or those related to the rules of humanitarian international law. This is the core of our research in investigating the responsibility of the states occupying Iraq, for there is a multiplicity in the range of their international responsibility. The first is their responsibility for the non-legitimate use of force and then the occupation, according to the rules of public international law. The second is their responsibility for the violations occurred in Iraq, according to the rules of humanitarian international law. Thus, we can investigate the possibility of finding the available legal mechanisms to implement this responsibility and detect the essence of the obstacles confronting them. .

References

  1. Second: Foreign sources1. Christian Reus-Smit, The Politics of International Law, Cambridge Studies In International Relations: 96, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004.2. Ian Johnstone, US-UN Relations after Iraq: The End of the World (Order) As We Know It ?, EJIL (2004), Vol.15, No.4.3. Marco Sassoli, State Responsibility for violations of international humanitarian law, RICR Juin IRRC June 2002 Vol. 84 No 846.4. Richard BurchILL, Nigel D. White And Justin Morris, International Conflict And Security Law, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.
Download this PDF file

Statistics